Legal Opinion
Bauer v. United States
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided March 21, 1995No. Civ. A. Nos. 9:94-118-22, 9:94-117-22PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CURRIE, District Judge.
These actions are brought pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671, et seq. Jurisdiction is based on 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b). The matters are before the court on the Motions for Summary Judgment by Defendant United States of America (hereinafter “the Government”). The court has carefully reviewed the entire record in these matters and heard oral argument of counsel on November 1, 1994. For the reasons discussed below, the court grants the Motions for Summary Judgment.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
The following factual…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Charbonnages De France v. Frank B. Smith, Juanita Smith, Frank Smith, Jr., Smith Brothers Construction Company and Continental Coal Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cummins Atlantic, Inc. v. Sonny's Camp-N-Travel Mart, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2007