Oglesby v. Chandler
Arizona Supreme Court
1Concurrence
McALISTER, J.,
Specially Concurring. — I concur in the opinion of Chief Justice LOCKWOOD. It is very plain from the language of House Bill 127 that it was enacted to procure a scientific survey not of a part only but of “all taxable property and classes of property throughout the State” for the purpose of placing such property upon the tax-rolls at the proper valuation, and it is equally plain from the allegations of the complaint, which are not merely undenied but for the purpose of this case admitted as true, that such a survey has not been made. It appears from the complaint that in the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BackusSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Bunten v. Rock Springs Grazing Ass'nWyoming Supreme Court · 1923
- Missouri v. DockerySupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Allen v. Pullman's Palace Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
- State ex rel. Bee Building Co. v. SavageNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.