Legal Opinion
Banister v. Burton
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 14, 2011No. 10-1484PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EVANS, Circuit Judge.
Troy Banister sued Chicago police officers Craig Burton and Marc Moore along with the City of Chicago (we’ll refer to all the defendants, collectively, as “the City”) alleging deprivation of his civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. A jury returned a verdict in favor of the City. Banister now appeals the admission of the testimony of one of the City’s main witnesses, the City’s failure to file an expert witness report under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(B), and the admission of a remark made during closing arguments by counsel for the City.
The jury in this case…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Lori David v. Caterpillar, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Mischelle Musser and Michael Musser v. Gentiva Health Services, F/k/a Olsten Health ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Raymond Rosen v. Ciba-Geigy CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Hall v. FlanneryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Markith Williams v. Christopher DieballCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- William Viramontes v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- ADT Security Services, Inc. v. Lisle-Woodridge Fire Protection DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Coleman v. American Family Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2011
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.