State v. Holmstrom
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.
This appeal presents three questions:(1) Was the jury array in Eau Claire county improperly constituted;(2) Was there sufficient credible evidence to support the jury’s verdicts that the defendant was guilty of burglary and possession of burglarious tools; and(3) Was the district attorney’s conduct improper?
Jury Array.
Prior to the trial in this case, the defendant challenged the jury array in Eau Claire county on the ground that it did not represent a fair cross section of the entire community. The three jury commissioners and the clerk of the circuit court were called to testify. At the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Thiel v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Whitus v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Ballard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- State v. BrodsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Oseman v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- James Barber v. James PonteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Wilson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. GradyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
- Bethards v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- McKissick v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.