Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Dundon

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 2011No. 2011-0339PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Jeffrey Raymond Dundon, Attorney Registration No. 0034271, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1985. On August 16, 2010, relator, Disciplinary Counsel, filed a complaint charging respondent with violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility and the Rules of Professional Conduct pertaining to his representation of Caroline Zell. On September 9, 2010, Dundon filed an answer denying the alleged violations. However, on January 5, 2011, the parties filed stipulations in which respondent admitted certain violations and respondent and relator proposed a six-month…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. BroerenOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Akron Bar Assn. v. FreedmanOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Dayton Bar Assn. v. SebreeOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Columbus Bar Assn. v. BhattOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Akron Bar Ass'n v. HarseyOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Akron Bar Ass'n v. SheniseOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Warren County Bar Association v. Ernst.Ohio Supreme Court · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API