Steinkritz Amusement Corp. v. Kaplan

The evidence presented a question of fact which when resolved in favor of the plaintiff justified the granting of an injunction restraining the defendant from picketing the premises in question.

In the case of Exchange Bakery & Restaurant, Inc., v. Rifkin (245 N, Y. 260, at p. 269) it was said: “ Where unlawful picketing has been continued; where violence and intimidation have been used and where misstatements as to the employers’ business have been distributed, a broad injunction prohibiting all picketing may be granted. The course of conduct of the strikers has been such as to indicate the…