Legal Opinion

James Supply Co. v. Frost

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 5, 1925No. 8 Div. 752PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

This is a creditor’s bill, seeking to have declared void a mortgage executed by the debtor, Thomas H. Frost, to respondent R. N. Cartwright, executed December 14, 1921, upon the ground the same was without consideration, or, in the alternative, to have said mortgage declared a general assignment under the provisions of section 8040, Code of 1923. The court below denied relief as to. either alternative upon which relief was sought, and dismissed the bill. From this decree complainants have prosecuted this appeal.

The learned chancellor has accompanied his decree with an opinion which fully…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. O'Conner Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Coosa Furnace Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  2. Ex parte BanksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  3. Kling v. TunstallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  4. Phillips-Neely Mercantile Co. v. BanksAlabama Court of Appeals · 1913
  5. Sitz v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lambert v. AndersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. National Union Life Insurance Company v. IngramSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  3. Garrett v. First Nat. Bank of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  4. Clear Creek, Inc. v. Royal American Corp. (In Re International Resorts, Inc.)District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1984
  5. Craig v. CraigSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API