Legal Opinion

Simpkins v. Southwestern Idaho Painters District Council No. 57

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1973No. 10738PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McQUADE, Chief Justice.

This appeal requires us to examine the uncertain jurisdictional relationship between state courts and the National Labor Relations Board, in the context of an action for damages and injunctive relief from organizational picketing. To provide a framework for analyzing the jurisdictional. issues, it is important to review current developments in the law of federal preemption.

I

The National Labor Relations Act,1 as amended,2 represents an effort by Congress to establish a uniform labor policy implemented by an expert administrative body. Sections 7 and 8 of the Act3 seek to…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Smith v. Evening News Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees of America v. LockridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Billy Jack for Her, Inc. v. New York Coat, Suit, Dress, Rainwear & Allied Workers' UnionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1981
  2. Twin Falls Construction Co. v. Operating Engineers Local 370Idaho Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Simpkins v. SW IDAHO PAINT. DIST. C. NO. 57Idaho Supreme Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API