Legal Opinion

Locals 302 & 612 of the International Union of Operating Engineers-Employers Construction Industry Retirement Trust ex rel. F5 Networks, Inc. v. McAdam

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 2009No. 81817-7PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChambers, J.

¶1 — Judge Robert S. Lasnik of the United States District Court, Western District of Washington, asked us to answer two certified questions:

“What test does Washington apply to determine whether allegations made pursuant to RCW 23B.07.400(2) by a shareholder seeking to initiate derivative litigation on behalf of a Washington corporation excuse that shareholder from first making demand on the board of directors to bring that litigation on behalf of the corporation?”; and
“If Washington follows Delaware’s demand futility standard, does it also follow the reasoning of Ryan v. Gifford, 918 A.2d 341…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  3. Brehm v. EisnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
  4. Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  5. Rales v. Blasband Ex Rel. Easco Hand Tools, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1993

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bradburn v. North Central Regional Library DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Bradburn v. NORTH CENT. REGIONAL LIBRARYWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Queen Anne Park Homeowners Ass'n v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Donlin v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  5. Peck v. AT & T MOBILITYWashington Supreme Court · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API