Arminius Chemical Co. v. White's Administratrix
Supreme Court of Virginia
Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Louisa county in an action of trespass on the case. The following instructions were given or refused, respectively, as indicated below: PLAINTIFF’S INSTRUCTION NO. 1 — GIVEN.
Read the full summary
Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Louisa county in an action of trespass on the case. The following instructions were given or refused, respectively, as indicated below: PLAINTIFF’S INSTRUCTION NO. 1 — GIVEN. “If the jury believe from the evidence that after the notices were posted by the defendant at different times, with respect to its employees using the skips, to be carried to and from within the mine at their own risk, the defendant did not refuse, but continued as before such notices were posted, to so carry its employees, including the plaintiff’s intestate, in such skips,…
1Opinion of the Court
Keith, P.,
delivered the opinion of the court.
White’s administratrix brought suit against the Arminius Chemical Company, Incorporated, in the Circuit Court of Louisa county, to recover damages for the death of her decedent by the wrongful act of the defendant company. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of $5,000, upon which the court entered judgment, and the case is before us upon a writ of error.
The case was tried upon an amended declaration which contains six counts, and the defendant is described as the “Arminius Chemical Company, a corporation created by *266and…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Real Estate Trust & Insurance v. Gwyn's AdministratrixSupreme Court of Virginia · 1912
- Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. WoodSupreme Court of Virginia · 1943
- Hickman v. Hygrade Packing CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
- O. K. Butler Const. Co. v. BentleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- Elliott v. United Realty Corp.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1925
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.