Legal Opinion

S.J. Amoroso Construction Co., Inc. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 15, 1992No. 92-16419Published

1Opinion of the Court

981 F.2d 1073

38 Cont.Cas.Fed. (CCH) P 76,465

S.J. AMOROSO CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., a California

Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES of America, United States General Services

Administration; and Richard G. Austin,

Administrator, General Services

Administration (Region 9, San

Francisco),

Defendants-

Appellees.

No. 92-16419.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Nov. 5, 1992.

Decided Dec. 15, 1992.

Andrew R. Wiener, Haas & Najarian, San Francisco, CA, for plaintiff-appellant.

George Chris Stoll, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Francisco, CA, for defendants-appellees.

Appeal from…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. M. Steinthal & Co., Inc. v. Robert J. Seamans, Jr., Secretary of the Air Force, Pioneer Parachute Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
  4. United States v. Vogel Fertilizer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. William Michael Jones v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, United Transportation UnionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API