Legal Opinion

Hudson v. Moon

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1999No. 97-CA-01059-SCTPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BANKS, Justice,

for the Court:

¶ 1. Appellants raise three issues for our consideration: (1) whether § 270 of the Mississippi Constitution and Miss.Code Ann. § 91-5-31 grant in them, the heirs at law of the testator, a vested interest in land subject to compulsory divesture by sale by a proscribed beneficiary institution; (2) whether this Court can consider the question of constitutionality, and if so, was mortmain in Mississippi, now repealed, unconstitutional; and (3) whether the estate proceeding is res judicata on the present application of mortmain. We conclude that the heirs had a vested…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Dunaway v. WH Hopper & Associates, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Anderson v. Jackson Mun. Airport Auth.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Estate of Anderson v. DEPOSIT GUAR. NAT.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Stone v. Independent Linen Service Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Covington County v. PageMississippi Supreme Court · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Boston v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Marshall Fisher v. Michael DrankusMississippi Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Cellular South, Inc. v. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2017
  4. TIE-REACE HOLLINGSWORTH v. City of LaurelMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Hinds County v. Mississippi Commission on Environmental QualityMississippi Supreme Court · 2011

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API