Legal Opinion

Cellular South, Inc. v. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 2017No. 2016-CA-00034-SCTPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, JUSTICE,

FOR THE COURT:

¶ 1. In February 2006, BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., and BellSouth MNS, Inc., filed an ex parte motion for a protective order in the Chancery Court for the First Judicial District of Hinds County. The documents sought to be protected fell into the following four categories: (1) an August 2005 proposal submitted by Bell-South to the Mississippi Department of Information Technology Services in response to the Department’s request for telecommunications products and services, (2) the Telecommunications Products and Service Agreement between BellSouth and the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Fernandez-Vargas v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Mladinich v. KohnMississippi Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Randy Charles Wilson v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Capital City Ins. v. GB" Boots" SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Musgrove v. Vicksburg & Nashville R. R.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1874

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mississippi Department of Corrections v. Roderick & Solange MacArthur Justice CenterMississippi Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Harper v. Southern Pine ElectricCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
  3. B. Michael Weber, M.D. and The Ob-Gyn Group of Laurel, P.A. v. Estate of Cameron Chase Hill, by and through Jana C. Bracewell, AdministratrixMississippi Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Baria v. Singing River Electric CooperativeDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2020
  5. Bennett Tax Co. Inc. v. Newton County, Mississippi, Newton County Chancery Clerk, and Newton County Tax Collector and AssessorCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2020

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API