Legal Opinion

Maddox v. Cohn

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 26, 2011No. 2777, September Term, 2009PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtZarnoch, J.

In this case, we have been asked to invalidate what appears to be a routine practice in some parts of Maryland of requiring a successful third-party bidder at a foreclosure sale to pay the trustees, who have been compensated by the court, an additional fee of $295 as an attorney’s fee for the review of settlement documents. We agree with the Circuit Court for Wicomico County that the imposition of the fee is improper because there is no explicit provision in a statute, Maryland rule, local rule, or in the debt instrument itself authorizing this charge. Although we find that such a fee would…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Jones v. RosenbergCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  2. Greenbriar Condominium v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  3. Bates v. CohnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  4. Fagnani v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  5. Mortgage Investors v. Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Maddox v. CohnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API