Saucer v. Giroux
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment in favor of defendant, entered upon an order of court sustaining a general demurrer to the complaint.
The action is based upon the alleged act of defendant in causing to be published in a newspaper false and libelous statements that the deceased adult brother of plaintiff Virginia Saucer was an illegitimate son of her deceased mother, which false statements, it is alleged, have caused plaintiff grievous mental and physical suffering, for which she asked judgment for five hundred thousand dollars.
The demurrer was properly sustained. [1] While the publication of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Skrocki v. StahlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Sorensen v. BalabanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Wellman v. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1892
- Bradt v. New Nonpareil Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- Sorenson v. BalabanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
3Cited by12 opinions
- Blatty v. New York Times Co.California Supreme Court · 1986
- Renfro Drug Co. v. LawsonTexas Supreme Court · 1942
- Lee v. WestonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Insull v. New York World-Telegram CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1959
- Kelly v. Johnson Publishing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.