Bean v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtLuke, J.
1. In the state of the record (the ground of the motion for a new trial based upon the refusal to continue the case being very meager and no exhibit being attached thereto) this court cannot say that the trial judge abused his discretion in overruling the defendant’s motion for a continuance of the case.
2. The 2d ground of the amendment to the motion for a new trial, complaining of the admission of certain oral testimony, cannot be considered, since the name of the witness whose testimony was admitted is not given, and it is not stated what objection was made to the testimony at the time it…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Trammell v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
- Bentley v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Allen v. ArthursCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962