Legal Opinion

Allen v. Arthurs

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 2, 1962No. 39583PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Russell, Judge.

1. "A conclusion in a pleading is not subject to special demurrer if the inference stated therein may be legitimately drawn from the special facts pleaded or from exhibits attached to and made a part of the pleadings.” Saliba v. Saliba, 202 Ga. 279 (9) (42 SE2d 748). It follows that a special demurrer to a paragraph of the answer stating that “an automobile ran into the rear end of the automobile being operated by the defendant, with sufficient force to knock her car into the rear end of the car being operated by petitioner” is not a conclusion because it fails to identify the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Clare v. DrexlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  2. Hunter v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  3. Saliba v. SalibaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  4. Veal v. BeallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  5. Hardy v. HardySupreme Court of Georgia · 1919

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wood v. Hub Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  2. Shackelford v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  3. Lovett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  4. Wilmington Cabinet Co. v. AutryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  5. Savannah Inn-Towner Motor Inn, Inc. v. McCauleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API