Cox v. Fowler
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
CARLEY, Justice.
After Rogers Rhine Turner died, his two daughters, Francie Evelyn Cox and Janice Eloise Fowler, litigated their respective rights to his estate. See Fowler v. Cox, 264 Ga. App. 880 (592 SE2d 510) (2003). Ms. Cox asserted, among her other claims, that Ms. Fowler should be disinherited for violating the in terrorem clause of their father’s will, which provides:
Should any beneficiaries hereunder contest or initiate legal proceedings to contest the validity of this Will or any provision herein or to prevent any provision herein from being carried out in accordance with its terms…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Transportation Insurance v. El Chico Restaurants, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1999
- Termnet Merchant Services, Inc. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
- Carringer v. RodgersSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
- Broach v. HesterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
3Cited by18 opinions
- Radioshack Corp. v. Cascade Crossing II, LLCSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
- Sinclair v. SinclairSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
- Russell v. Wachovia Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Holland v. CavinessSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
- Code Revision Comm'n Ex Rel. Gen. Assembly of Ga. v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.