Legal Opinion

Glew v. Ohio Savings Bank

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 2008No. 20051092PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEHRING, Justice:

INTRODUCTION

€ 1 In this appeal, Ohio Savings Bank challenges the outcome of a bench trial. Ohio Savings claims that it, as the holder of a $271,000 bridge loan note, was entitled to full payment of the note despite the fact that the makers of the note, James and Joan Nichol, had already directed the payoff proceeds to the soon-to-be-bankrupt FirstPlus Financial, Inc., which had transferred the note to Ohio Savings after originating it. The trial court, however, ruled that the doctrines of equitable estoppel and apparent authority provided legal justification for the Nichols'…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. WalkerUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. LevinUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  4. S.B.D. v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Swan Creek Village Homeowners Ass'n v. WarneUtah Supreme Court · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. MaestasUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  2. H.U.F. v. W.P.W.Utah Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. BriggsUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Salt Lake City Corp. v. Big Ditch Irrigation Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Hale v. Big H Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2012

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API