Legal Opinion

United States v. James Bailey-Snyder

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 3, 2019No. 18-1601PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARDIMAN, Circuit Judge.

This appeal presents a question of first impression in this Court: does an inmate's placement in administrative segregation while he is under investigation for a new crime trigger his right to a speedy trial under the Sixth Amendment or the Speedy Trial Act? We hold it does not, so Bailey-Snyder was not entitled to dismissal of his complaint. Nor was there improper vouching or cumulative error in Bailey-Snyder's trial. We will affirm.

I

While incarcerated at the Federal Correctional Institution, Schuylkill, James Bailey-Snyder was moved to administrative segregation…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. PungitoreCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  3. UNITED STATES of America v. Darus H. ZEHRBACH, Appellant in No. 93-7477. Alex A. Mervis, Appellant in No. 93-7493Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  4. United States v. Robert WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  5. United States v. Rodolfo BethancourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. LaneSupreme Court of Georgia · 2020
  2. Bauzo-Santiago v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2020
  3. Frasier v. Warden of SCI-Coal TownshipDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
  4. GRIGGS v. DAVISDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API