United States v. James Bailey-Snyder
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HARDIMAN, Circuit Judge.
This appeal presents a question of first impression in this Court: does an inmate's placement in administrative segregation while he is under investigation for a new crime trigger his right to a speedy trial under the Sixth Amendment or the Speedy Trial Act? We hold it does not, so Bailey-Snyder was not entitled to dismissal of his complaint. Nor was there improper vouching or cumulative error in Bailey-Snyder's trial. We will affirm.
I
While incarcerated at the Federal Correctional Institution, Schuylkill, James Bailey-Snyder was moved to administrative segregation…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. PungitoreCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- UNITED STATES of America v. Darus H. ZEHRBACH, Appellant in No. 93-7477. Alex A. Mervis, Appellant in No. 93-7493Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Robert WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Rodolfo BethancourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. LaneSupreme Court of Georgia · 2020
- Bauzo-Santiago v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2020
- Frasier v. Warden of SCI-Coal TownshipDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
- GRIGGS v. DAVISDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023