Legal Opinion

John Dixon O'Malley v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided May 3, 2016No. 1270152PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLEMENTS, Judge.

By summons issued pursuant to Code § 3.2-6540, John Dixon O’Malley (appellant) was ordered to respond to an allegation that he was the owner of a dangerous dog. At a jury trial, the Commonwealth presented evidence that appellant’s dog attacked and injured the dog of Randall Powell. At the conclusion of the proceeding, the jury found appellant’s dog to be a dangerous dog as set forth in Code § 3.2-6540. On appeal of this finding, appellant contends the trial court erred: 1) in denying his motion to dismiss the proceeding because § 10-1 of the Code of the City of Richmond…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BurnsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1990
  2. Sheets v. CastleSupreme Court of Virginia · 2002
  3. Commonwealth v. RaffertySupreme Court of Virginia · 1991
  4. Canova Electrical Contracting, Inc. v. LMI InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1996
  5. Commonwealth v. SoutherlySupreme Court of Virginia · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. King William County and Virginia Association of Counties Group v. Linda JonesCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2016
  2. Arthur Anderson Warren v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2019
  3. Genesis Hammond-Schrock v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2026
  4. Karl Mogensen v. County of RockbridgeCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2026
  5. King William County and Virginia Association of Counties Group v. Linda JonesCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API