John Dixon O'Malley v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
CLEMENTS, Judge.
By summons issued pursuant to Code § 3.2-6540, John Dixon O’Malley (appellant) was ordered to respond to an allegation that he was the owner of a dangerous dog. At a jury trial, the Commonwealth presented evidence that appellant’s dog attacked and injured the dog of Randall Powell. At the conclusion of the proceeding, the jury found appellant’s dog to be a dangerous dog as set forth in Code § 3.2-6540. On appeal of this finding, appellant contends the trial court erred: 1) in denying his motion to dismiss the proceeding because § 10-1 of the Code of the City of Richmond…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BurnsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1990
- Sheets v. CastleSupreme Court of Virginia · 2002
- Commonwealth v. RaffertySupreme Court of Virginia · 1991
- Canova Electrical Contracting, Inc. v. LMI InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1996
- Commonwealth v. SoutherlySupreme Court of Virginia · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- King William County and Virginia Association of Counties Group v. Linda JonesCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2016
- Arthur Anderson Warren v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2019
- Genesis Hammond-Schrock v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2026
- Karl Mogensen v. County of RockbridgeCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2026
- King William County and Virginia Association of Counties Group v. Linda JonesCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.