Legal Opinion
Hemze v. County of Renville
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 20, 1959No. 37,644, 37,645PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Matson, Justice.
Two landowners appeal separately from judgments assessing benefits and damages in a county ditch proceeding.
The facts herein are not complicated. Proceedings were instituted by petition under M. S. A. 106.031 for the establishment of Renville County Ditch No. 113B. From the report of the viewers assessing damages and benefits seven landowners, including appellants, and the town of Troy appealed to the district court pursuant to § 106.631. Over the objection of appellants, the lower court ordered a joint trial of the eight appeals before a jury. Appellants herein are appealing…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Seidlitz v. County of FaribaultSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Alsleben v. Oliver CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Alden v. County of ToddSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- Laue v. County of FaribaultSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- In Re Judicial Ditch No. 7, Martin & Faribault CountiesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Marso v. Mankato Clinic, Ltd.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- In Re Petition of Minneapolis Area Development Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964