Towle v. Wilder
Supreme Court of Vermont
It is agreed, that both plaintiff and defendant are now, and were at the time of the commencement of this suit, residents of the town of Plattsburgh, in the State of New Y ork, and that the contract upon which this suit is brought, as well as the contract upon which it is sought to charge this trustee, was made in the State of New York.
Read the full summary
It is agreed, that both plaintiff and defendant are now, and were at the time of the commencement of this suit, residents of the town of Plattsburgh, in the State of New Y ork, and that the contract upon which this suit is brought, as well as the contract upon which it is sought to charge this trustee, was made in the State of New York. The trustee is a body corporate, chartered and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of New York, under the name of the “ President, Managers and Company of the Delaware and Hudson Canal Company,” and having its principal office and place of…
1Opinion of the Court
Trustee Process.
Trustee Process. Heard on an agreed statement, September Term, 1877, Dunton, J., presiding. Judgment pro forma that the trustee was chargeable for the sum of $35.50.
This case is published in this volume, as it appears that similar suits are being brought. It was sent to the Reporter by Royce, Ch. J., on the request of Veazey, J. It was heard at the January Term, 1878, of the Supreme Court of Rutland County, before Pierpoint, Ch. J., Barrett, Royce, and Powers, JJ. Pierpoint, Ch. J., rendered an oral opinion; but it was never reported.
*623Agreed statement: This is an action of…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Renier v. HurlbutWisconsin Supreme Court · 1891
- Nichols v. HooperSupreme Court of Vermont · 1889
- Hawley v. HurdSupreme Court of Vermont · 1900
- Connor v. Hanover Ins.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Michigan · 1886
- Craig v. GunnSupreme Court of Vermont · 1894
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.