Legal Opinion
State v. Lande
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 12, 1985No. C6-85-412PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARKER, Judge.
Appellant Dale Lande was convicted of burglary in the second degree, Minn.Stat. § 609.582, subd. 2(d)(1984). He proceeded pro se at trial, but argues on appeal the trial court should have appointed counsel to assist him. He also raises other issues dealing with the denial of his motion for a new trial, the- denial of his request for a continuance and the sufficiency of the evidence. We reverse and remand for a new trial.
FACTS
Winona County law enforcement officials obtained information that appellant was planning to burglarize the Dog Patch Inn in Troy, Minnesota. After…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mayberry v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. SaviorCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- In Re the Welfare of G.L.H.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- State v. RubinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- In Re the Welfare of G.L.H.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- State v. GraffCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.