Legal Opinion
Rickey v. Morrison
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided March 2, 1888PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Error to Ionia.. (Smith, J.) Assumpsit. ■ Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
Plaintiff brought this action in the circuit court for the county of Ionia upon a note of which the following is a copy:
“Thirty days from date I promise to payE. D. Rickey two hundred and twenty-five dollars, at First National Bank in Ionia, Michigan. John E. Morrison,
“ By Lemuel Clute, His Attorney in Fact.
“November 9, 1885.”
Defendant pleaded the general issue, and gave notice that he would insist upon the trial—
“ That the note, a copy of which is attached to the plaintiff’s declaration in this case, had no good or valuable consideration to support it, and contains a mere nude promise, which…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Van Dyke v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1851
- Weed v. TerryMichigan Supreme Court · 1846
- Port Huron & Southwestern Railway Co. v. PotterMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hinckley v. McLaughlinMichigan Supreme Court · 1912