Legal Opinion

Rickey v. Morrison

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1888PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Ionia.. (Smith, J.) Assumpsit. ■ Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

Plaintiff brought this action in the circuit court for the county of Ionia upon a note of which the following is a copy:

“Thirty days from date I promise to payE. D. Rickey two hundred and twenty-five dollars, at First National Bank in Ionia, Michigan. John E. Morrison,
“ By Lemuel Clute, His Attorney in Fact.
“November 9, 1885.”

Defendant pleaded the general issue, and gave notice that he would insist upon the trial—

“ That the note, a copy of which is attached to the plaintiff’s declaration in this case, had no good or valuable consideration to support it, and contains a mere nude promise, which…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Van Dyke v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1851
  2. Weed v. TerryMichigan Supreme Court · 1846
  3. Port Huron & Southwestern Railway Co. v. PotterMichigan Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hinckley v. McLaughlinMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API