Legal Opinion
Hinckley v. McLaughlin
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 17, 1912No. Docket No. 58PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Error to Jackson; Parkinson, J. Frederick P. Hinckley presented a claim against the estate of Miar McLaughlin, deceased, which was contested by Emma McLaughlin, administratrix, and disallowed by the commissioners on claims. On appeal by claimant to the circuit court, a verdict was directed for defendant. Claimant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, C. J.
The claimant presented the following as a claim against the estate of Dr. McLaughlin:
“Estate of Dr. Miar McLaughlin, Deceased.
“To Fred P. Hinckley, Dr.
“1908.
“Aug. 10.
“Below is a copy of the note and agreement given me by Dr. Miar McLaughlin on which there is now due me the sum of $11,647.40.
“[Copy.]
“Jackson, Mich., April 12, 1902.
“I Dr. M. McLaughlin. Agree to pay F. P. Hinckley. On or befour the twelve day of April 1912 the sum of $10,000. Ten Thousand Dollers At three per cent, interest. The intest to be paid on or befour April 12 of each year. For his undived half interest in the Automic…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Carnwright v. . GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Manistee National Bank v. SeymourMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Thomas v. CaulkettMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Dean v. CarruthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Conrad Seipp Brewing Co. v. McKittrickMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dynamic Enterprises, Inc. v. Fitness World of Jackson, Inc. (In Re Dynamic Enterprises, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1983
- Gross v. Von DolckeMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
- Hinckley v. McLaughlinMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Hinckley v. McLaughlinMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Turner v. Peoples State BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1941