Legal Opinion

People v. Hurst

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 29, 1960No. Crim. 7033PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J.

In count I of an information defendants Arthur Lee Hurst and Anniece Jones were accused of unlawfully having heroin in their possession on May 18, 1959. In count II they were accused of unlawfully having marijuana in their possession on the same date. The court, sitting without a jury, found them guilty on both counts. Arthur Lee Hurst was sentenced to state prison. He appeals from the judgment and order denying a new trial. He will be referred to as the defendant. Annieee Jones did not appeal.

About 3:30 p.m. on May 18, 1959, Officer Garrahan of the Los Angeles Police Department…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. People v. SimonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Willson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. People v. BlodgettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. People v. PrewittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. People v. EstradaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. The People of the State of California, Robert A. Heinze, Warden v. Arthur Lee HurstCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  3. People v. CedenoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. People v. IrvinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. People v. GlaserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API