Legal Opinion
Paclawski v. Bristol Laboratories, Inc.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 24, 1967No. 40921PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Per curiam
In separate actions, Walter Paclawski and his wife, Elizabeth Paclawski, sued the defendant drug company and its salesman, John Null, for damages resulting from the use by Mrs. Paclawski of a medical preparation called “Kantrex” in 1958. It was alleged that the drug was prescribed and administered by Dr. Downs of the Cooper Clinic in Fort Smith, Arkansas, and that it was developed and placed on the market by the defendant drug company. The co-defendant, John Null, is a resident of Tulsa County, Oklahoma, and no questions as to venue are raised in the briefs. After the issues were made up by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hasselrode v. GnageySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Holland v. National Automotive Fibres, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1937
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. GentrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Hodges v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Oklahoma Oncology & Hematology P.C. v. US Oncology, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Harvell v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Ferrell Construction Co. v. Russell Creek Coal Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Jeanne Armsted Rhody and Donnell Rhody v. State Farm Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- Golsen v. ONG Western, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.