Sage v. Crowley
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Separate actions in ejectment in tbe district court for Stevens county by plaintiff, as assignee in trust of tbe Hastings & Dakota Railway Company. From separate orders, Steidl, J., overruling tbeir several demurrers to tbe complaints, defendants appealed. The issues raised in all the cases being the same the appeals were argued and submitted together.
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
These actions are brought to recover possession of certain lands within the indemnity limits of the land grant to the Hastings & Dakota Railway Company under the act of congress of July 4, 1866.
The complaint in each in substance states: That the.grant was accepted by the state of Minnesota by an act approved March 7, 1867. That the company duly surveyed and definitely located its line of railroad, ánd caused a map thereof to be transmitted to the governor of the state and secretary of the interior, and that the same was duly approved and filed on June 26, 1867. That by the terms of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Schulenberg v. HarrimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- United States v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- McCreery v. HaskellSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Hanan v. SageU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota · 1893
- Minneapolis & St. Cloud Railroad v. Duluth & Winnipeg RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Norton v. FrederickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Morris v. SvorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Sage v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904