Kaplan v. 442 Wellington Cooperative Building Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PARSONS, Senior District Judge.
The defendants have moved for summary judgment. The court concludes that at this stage of the case and considering all of the evidence that has been made available, including that bearing upon the issue of the intent of the defendants, this case can be ruled upon as a matter of law. Summary judgment will be both practical and time saving. It should be granted.
Defendants are the 442 Wellington Cooperative Building Corporation, title holder to a luxury condominium apartment building, and its officers and directors, most if not all of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- General Building Contractors Assn., Inc. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Metropolitan Housing Development Corp., Northwest Opportunity Center and Eluteria D. Maldonado, Intervening v. Village of Arlington HeightsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Illinois State Employees Union, Council 34 v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Arneda L. Hamilton v. Stephen Svatik and Eleanor SvatikCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Littlefield v. McGuffey (In Re McGuffey)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
- Peckmann v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Thomas v. First Federal Sav. Bank of IndianaDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1987
- Cavalieri-Conway v. L. Butterman & AssociatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.