Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Odus M. Hennessee
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 3, 1992No. 89-6365PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
966 F.2d 534
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, a corporation
organized and existing under the laws of the
United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Odus M. HENNESSEE and Edna M. Hennessee, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 89-6365.
United States Court of Appeals,
Tenth Circuit.
Jan. 3, 1992.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Charles HatmakerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. BerrDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1986
- Mortgage Clearing Corp. v. Baughman Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Mid-America Corporation v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Beneficial Hawaii, Inc. v. KidaHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
- Chiles v. Ceridian CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. FratesDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1999
- 22 Employee Benefits Cas. 1403, Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23926e Leo W. Chiles, Gloria Herren, Helen L. Byrd, Joy L. Oleo, Phyllis McMillan Robert D. Hunter, Barbara Jeffries, Glorice Biglow, Jacqueline Steele v. Ceridian Corporation Seagate Technologies, Foreign CorporationsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Beneficial Hawaii, Inc. v. KidaHawaii Supreme Court · 2001