Great Northern Railway Co. v. Mustad
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion
I agree with the rule stated in paragraph 1 of the syllabus and further agree that under that rule the complaint in this action does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action for injunctive relief. I also agree with the rule stated in paragraph 7 of the syllabus, but I am not prepared to agree with what is said in the opinion with respect to the complaint stating facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action for a declaratory judgment; or with what is said in the opinion with respect to the order appealed from, and the limitations placed upon the questions determined…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Washington-Detroit Theatre Co. v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Ford Motor Co. v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
- Bismarck Water Supply Co. v. BarnesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
- Federal Farm Mortgage Corp. v. FalkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
- Torgrinson v. Norwich School District No. 31North Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.