Legal Opinion

Great Northern Railway Co. v. Mustad

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1948No. File 7082Published

1Opinion

I agree with the rule stated in paragraph 1 of the syllabus and further agree that under that rule the complaint in this action does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action for injunctive relief. I also agree with the rule stated in paragraph 7 of the syllabus, but I am not prepared to agree with what is said in the opinion with respect to the complaint stating facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action for a declaratory judgment; or with what is said in the opinion with respect to the order appealed from, and the limitations placed upon the questions determined…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Washington-Detroit Theatre Co. v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Ford Motor Co. v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Bismarck Water Supply Co. v. BarnesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Federal Farm Mortgage Corp. v. FalkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Torgrinson v. Norwich School District No. 31North Dakota Supreme Court · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API