Legal Opinion
Federal Farm Mortgage Corp. v. Falk
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided December 14, 1936No. File No. 6426PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChristianson, J.
The plaintiff brought this action to foreclose a mortgage executed and delivered to it by the defendants, Martin Falk and his wife. The mortgage was executed and delivered on January 2, 1934, and covers certain lands in Stutsman county in this state. The county of Stutsman, and the state of North Dakota, doing business as the State Hail Insurance Department, were joined as parties defendant. It is alleged in the complaint that they claim certain interests in, or liens or encumbrances upon, said real property adverse to the plaintiff. It is further alleged that there is an unpaid hail…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- Ogden v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- State ex rel. Linde v. TaylorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
- Provident Institution for Savings v. Mayor of Jersey CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. CromwellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
- Schillerstrom v. SchillerstromNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1948
- Verry v. TrenbeathNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
- F. W. Woolworth Co. v. GrayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
- Catholic Order of Foresters v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.