Stearn v. United States
District Court, W.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL, Chief Judge.
The plaintiffs in this action, J. M. Stearn and Dan Hartman, who will hereafter be referred to as Stearn and Hartman respectively, are both motor carriers in interstate commerce. The purpose of the action is to have the court vacate and set aside an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission (hereafter referred to as the Commission) which denied approval of a proposed sale and transfer by Hartman to Stearn of certain of the former’s operating rights. Jurisdiction is invoked under 28 U.S.C.A. § 41(28), now 28 U.S.C.A. § 1336, and 49 U.S.C.A. §§ 17(9) and 305(g). (Note: Since…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Manhattan General Equipment Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Miller v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Campbell Fed. Prohibition Administrator v. Galeno Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
- United States v. ReslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. Two Hundred Barrels of WhiskeySupreme Court of the United States · 1877
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State Board of Health v. Virginia Hospital Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1985
- AAACON Auto Transport, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
- Greyhound Corporation v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1963
- Cargo Express, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1972
- Skip-By-Truck Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1962