In the Interest of T. J.

Adams, Judge.

In two separate appeals, the mother and putative father of an infant appeal a juvenile court’s determination that their child is deprived. They contend the evidence was insufficient to support the findings. We disagree and affirm.

“On appeal from a juvenile court’s order finding deprivation, we review the evidence in the light most favorable to the juvenile court’s *548judgment to determine whether any rational trier of fact could have found by clear and convincing evidence that the child was deprived.” (Punctuation and footnote omitted.) In the Interest of M. L. C., 249 Ga. App. 435,…