In the Interest of S. V.

Ruffin, Judge.

The biological mother challenges the juvenile court’s order in which it found S. V. to be deprived. As the clear and convincing evidence supports the juvenile court’s ruling, we affirm.

On appeal from a deprivation order, we view the evidence in a light most favorable to the juvenile court’s ruling to ascertain “whether any rational trier of fact could have found by clear and convincing evidence that the child was deprived.”1 In so doing, we neither weigh the evidence nor assess witness credibility.2

Viewed in this manner, the evidence shows that S. V. was born in April 1998. In…