Scott v. Wimberly
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Russell, Chief Justice.
A caveat was filed by a husband to the probate in solemn form of the will of his wife, in which she devised him one dollar. Lack of mental capacity to make a will was alleged. An amendment to the caveat was offered, in which undue influence and coercion were alleged. On objection this amendment was disallowed. The trial resulted in a verdict in favor of the propounder. A motion for new trial was overruled, and the caveator excepted. Error was assigned also on the dis-allowance of the offered amendment to the caveat.
*562The court erred in disallowing the amendment, which was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jones v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
- Griffin v. BarrettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- Morris v. StokesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1857
- Field v. BrantleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Davis v. FrederickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Saliba v. SalibaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Scott v. WimberlySupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Beale v. GrimsleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- Saliba v. SalibaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947