Legal Opinion

Davis v. Frederick

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 13, 1923No. 3393PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, P. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

The first ground of the amendment to the motion for a new trial assigns error upon the following charge of the court: “ The bur.den of proof in the case is primarily with Edwin S. Davis, who offers the will for probate. If the party offering the will ior probate proves its execution, proves that John W. Johnson was apparently of sound mind, proves that the will was, or paper was, freely and voluntarily executed, then the petitioner has *812carried the burden of proof to that extent, and the burden is cast upon the caveators to meet that prima facie case.” The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bancroft v. OtisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Slaughter v. HeathSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  3. Evans v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1874
  4. Moore v. SpierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  5. Beall v. MannSupreme Court of Georgia · 1848

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Brumbelow v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  2. Griffin v. BarrettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  3. Manley v. CombsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  4. Bowman v. BowmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  5. Branson v. RoelofszWyoming Supreme Court · 1937

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API