Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re the Arbitration between Deering Milliken & Co. & Boepple Sportswear Mills, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 17, 1957Published

1Dissent

Frank, J. (dissenting).

We must determine if from the record it can be ascertained whether the arbitrators exceeded the powers given them under the terms of the arbitration agreement.

The pertinent provision of the agreement for submission reads as follows: “ The limit of Seller’s liability for defective yarn, shall be the difference in the value on the contract date of delivery between the yarn specified and the yarn actually delivered. * * * In no event shall Buyer he entitled to claim consequential damages and in no event shall damages include profit on contemplated use or profit of any…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Bernhardt v. Polygraphic Co. of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Marchant v. Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  4. In Re the Arbitration Between Western Union Telegraph Co. & American Communications Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  5. Matter of WilkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1902

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API