Legal Opinion

Bendl v. Kulongoski

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1995No. SC S42393; SC S42394PublishedCited by 7 opinions

(Cases Consolidated for Argument and Opinion)

1Opinion of the Court

*163GRABER, J.

In this original proceeding, two petitioners challenge the ballot title for a proposed initiative measure. Petitioners are electors who, in a timely manner, submitted written comments about the Attorney General’s draft ballot title, pursuant to ORS 250.067(1). Accordingly, petitioners are entitled to seek a.different title in this court. ORS 250.085(2). Most of the arguments that petitioners make differ from the comments that they made during the administrative process, but those arguments in several respects “concem[] language added to or removed from the draft title after…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Garst v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  2. MEA-MFT v. Fox (LR 127)Montana Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Bendl v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Garst v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  5. MEA-MFT v. Fox (LR 127)Montana Supreme Court · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API