Legal Opinion

Garst v. Myers

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1999No. SC S46873PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*531VAN HOOMISSEN, J.

Petitioner, the Executive Director of the Oregon State Bar, challenges the Attorney General’s ballot title for a proposed initiative measure. She is an elector who, in a timely manner and pursuant to ORS 250.067(1), submitted written comments on the Attorney General’s draft ballot title. Accordingly, petitioner is entitled to seek a different title in this court. ORS 250.085(2). We modify the Attorney General’s ballot title and certify it as modified.

The proposed initiative measure would give voters in judicial elections the choice of voting for “None of the Above” by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Phillips v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Bendl v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kain/Waller v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Earls v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Dirks v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Earls v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Garst v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API