Legal Opinion

Grummett v. Rushen

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 26, 1985No. 84-2059PublishedCited by 150 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TANG, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs, inmates at San Quentin prison (“inmates”), brought a class action seeking declaratory and injunctive relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2201 (1982) and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1982). The inmates asserted that the prison policy and practice of allowing female correctional officers to view male inmates in states of partial or total nudity while dressing, showering, being strip searched, or using toilet facilities violated rights of privacy guaranteed by the United States Constitution. The district court, 587 F.Supp. 913, granted summary judgment in favor of defendants, Director…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by150 opinions

  1. Raymond Watison v. Mary CarterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. Joseph Toussaint, Plaintiffs/appellees/cross-Appellants v. Daniel McCarthy Defendants/appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. Oliver v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  4. Robert Michenfelder v. George Sumner Lieutenant Koon C/o Horn C/o Leslie Sgt Jenae Holmes Sgt Stuffelbeam James ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  5. Lawrence H. Kent v. Perry Johnson and Dale FoltzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987

145 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API