Legal Opinion

McKinley v. Stripling

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1989No. C-7426PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPEARS, Justice.

The question presented is must the trial court ask a “proximate cause” issue to the jury in a medical malpractice informed consent case. No such instruction was requested by the plaintiffs, Geneva and Albert McKinley, and none was given to the jury. Based on the jury verdict, judgment was rendered for the plaintiffs against the defendant, Dr. Dennis Stripling. The court of appeals reversed the trial court’s judgment and held that the trial court’s failure to submit a proximate cause issue was error. 746 S.W.2d 502. The court of appeals *408also held that McKinley’s failure to…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wilson v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Peterson v. ShieldsTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Shirley Karp, Individually, Etc. v. Denton A. Cooley and Domingo S. LiottaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  4. Barclay v. CampbellTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Forney v. Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Cosgrove v. GrimesTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Diamond Shamrock Refining & Marketing Co. v. MendezTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Knoll v. Neblett, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
  4. Byrd v. Woodruff, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1994
  5. Baylor University Medical Center v. Biggs, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2007

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API