Legal Opinion

Curtice v. Crawford County Bank

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Arkansas

Decided September 20, 1901PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Equity. Suit to enforce lien on bank stock pledged as collateral security.

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, District Judge.

The controlling inquiry in this case is whether the plaintiff, J. M. Curtice, has a first lien on the stock of Robert S. Hynes in the Crawford County Bank, it being evidenced by stock certificates numbered 108 and 133. Both certificates were issued to defendant Hynes. He was cashier of the bank when certificate 108 was issued, but had ceased to be cashier when certificate 133 was issued. Certificate 108 was issued June 16, 1891, and was for 200 shares of $23 each, — $5,000; certificate 133 was issued March 15, 1894, for 40 shares of $25 each, or $1,000. Plaintiff claims…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cragie v. . HadleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Union Bank of Georgetown v. LairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1817
  3. Dwight v. . St. JohnNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  4. National Security Bank v. CushmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  5. Mathis v. Pridham, ReceiverCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1892

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Plath v. MullinsWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Faulkner v. Bank of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API