Legal Opinion

Davenport v. Puett

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 30, 1908No. 756PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Certiorari, from Forsyth superior court — Judge Gober. August 37, 1907.

1Opinion of the CourtHill, C. J.

The questions in this ease arise on a motion to distribute a fund in a justice’s court. Davenport and Puett liad brought the money into court on process of garnishment, and there were three claimants of the fund, — Davenport, Puett, and Fowler, ■ — all of whom held executions against the defendant. These fi. fas. were a part of the motion to distribute, and it appeared .that the oldest was that in favor of Fowler, and the next in-date’ihat in favor of Puett. Davenport filed a caveat to the fi. fa. held by Puett, on various grounds, and had written consent to make an oral attack on the fi. fa.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rousch v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Byers v. ByersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  2. Bethea v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
  3. Thornton v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API