Legal Opinion
Gamble v. Department of the Army
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 23, 2008No. Civil Action 08-207 (ESH)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, District Judge.
Plaintiff has sued defendants for alleged violations of the Privacy Act of 1974 (“Privacy Act”), 5 U.S.C. § 552a. In a Memorandum Opinion dated June 4, 2008, the Court granted a motion to dismiss with respect to the State of Alaska defendants (the Alaska Department of Military and Veterans Affairs, Alaska Army National Guard, and the Alaska National Guard Youth Corps). See Gamble v. Dep’t of the Army, 557 F.Supp.2d 151, 152-53 (D.D.C.2008). Plaintiff has now moved to amend his complaint to include claims based on the Freedom of Information…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Chrysler Corp. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Doe v. ChaoSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Doe v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Dick v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Hurt v. District of Columbia Court Services & Offender Supervision AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Reed v. Department of the NavyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Freeman v. PhillipsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020