Legal Opinion
Hurt v. District of Columbia Court Services & Offender Supervision Agency
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 8, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2007-1167PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
REGGIE B. WALTON, District Judge.
This civil action brought pro se is on partial remand from the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit for further proceedings to address the plaintiffs claim brought under the improper disclosure provision of the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a (2000). See Hurt v. Cromer, No. 09-5224, Order (D.C.Cir. June 11, 2010). 1 At the time giving rise to this action, the plaintiff was a parolee under the supervision of the Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency for the District of Columbia (“CSOSA”). See Hurt v.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Ross J. Laningham v. United States NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hill v. SmootCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Fletcher v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Aunhkhotep v. JordanDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2024
- Hill v. Wilson SmootDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Pinson v. Unknown PartyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.