Legal Opinion

Foree v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 19, 1833PublishedCited by 5 opinions

PRACTICE.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Robertson

Two points of practice are presented in this case for con-deration.

First. Should this court notice a bill of exceptions purporting to have been taken after the trial, but during the same term, and which, using the present tense, “ ex-¿epts, ” does not expressly siiew that the exception was made at the proper time 9

Second. If the circuit court refuse to permit a competent witness to be examined, should the judgment be reversed for that cause alone, unless it shall appear that the witness was offered to prove something pertinent to the issue ?

First. Such an exception'as that which has been…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Robertson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  2. McGinness v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Horne v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Rickerstricker v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1876
  5. Hollister v. ReznorOhio Supreme Court · 1858

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API