Legal Opinion

Miguez v. Blake

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 11, 1931No. 8547PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant in error applied for an injunction to restrain plaintiffs in error from erecting structures on her land and to prevent the obstruction of a certain street and alley, and for $500 damages. The injunction was granted, and plaintiffs in error commanded to remove all structures erected by them on the land of defendant in error, and enjoined from obstructing the alley and Fredericksburg Road.

A judgment by default was rendered by the court against the plaintiffs in error, who were defendants in the lower court, who, however, after the trial agreed to the statement of facts. How the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Foster v. BourgeoisTexas Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Foster v. BourgeoisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. City of Aransas Pass v. Eureka Fire Hose Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  4. Louisiana-Rio Grande Canal Co. v. QuinnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Martin v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hale County v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  2. Allen v. Virginia Hill Water Supply Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API