Nome Beach Lighterage & Transportation Co. v. Munich Assur. Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Action on Policy of Marine Insurance. On motion by defendants for new trial.
1Opinion of the Court
MORROW, Circuit Judge.
This is an action brought May 31, 1901, by the plaintiff to recover from the defendants the sum of $2,500, claimed to be due under a policy of insurance issued by the defendants insuring plaintiff’s interest as owner in the body, machinery, tackle, apparel, and other furniture of the barkentine Catherine Sudden, for the period of one year, beginning on the 26th day of March, 1900, and continuing until the 26th day of March, 1901. By the terms of the policy the defendants insured the plaintiff against perils of the sea and other losses and misfortunes in said policy…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Allis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Doyle v. Union Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- General Mutual Insurance v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
- Orient Insurance v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Moores v. Louisville UnderwritersUnited States Circuit Court · 1882
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Russ-Field Corp. v. Underwriters at Lloyd'sCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Fireman's Fund Ins. v. Globe Nav. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916
- Thames & Mersey Marine Ins. v. Pacific Creosoting Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915
- City Motor Trucking Co. v. Franklin Fire Ins.Oregon Supreme Court · 1925
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. v. Pacific Cold Storage Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1907
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.